We Knew About COVID Vax and Miscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries – Part 2

This 2-part series is not only to expose COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ dangers, but to help more Americans realize the scale of the deceit. Our government, and its press enablers; the associations, universities, and medical journals that influence professionals by discounting truth and trumpeting falsehoods are riddled with product royalties, manipulated studies, and contempt for those they serve. Please share this article so others can understand the scope of the problem we all face. Thank you.

---

At a WH COVID briefing on April 23, 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky announced, “CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID-19 vaccine.”

At the time, the CDC had no credible information supporting that claim. Their apparent purpose was to reduce vaccine hesitancy to gain maximum uptake.

The Randomized Control Trial (RCT), the ‘gold standard’ validation they needed was not completed until July 15, 2022. The study data wasn’t finalized until March 9, 2023, and the public wouldn’t see it until July 30, 2023, a full year after completion.

Still the CDC continued pushing jabs and women took them, trusting the government was acting in their interests.

That wasn’t the case and Pfizer’s ‘gold standard’ study was not what it appeared.

Measuring Immunity When You Can’t Measure Immunity

Ideally, studies measure a vaccine’s effectiveness by how well it prevents infection, illness, hospitalization, or death. But new vaccine injections can be risky for pregnant women’s changing immune systems pus the trial’s 351 participants were too few for a meaningful clinical study,

Instead, Pfizer measured the antibody levels from mothers’ blood samples taken before and again after vaccination to see if the vaccine increased the body’s protection from COVID-19.

The Trouble Begins

But the FDA warns that antibodies as a surrogate for clinical studies only indicates if your body has an increased response to the virus, but not if that response prevents infection, illness, hospitalization, or death.

The FDA’s guidance is clear: “…antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time…”

The Catch-22

The antibody tests were only the beginning disaster.

Study enrollment was terminated early because too few pregnant women volunteered. Why?

The CDC’s recommendations for pregnant women, who had already been frightened into getting the vaccine, made the placebo arms unethical to recruit into as it denied the shots to those women who wanted them.

The catch-22: The CDC’s vaccine promotion made it impossible to attract enough participants to conduct the very study they needed to prove it worked.

The study’s problems got worse…

• Women were unblinded 1 month after delivery so they could get vaccinated elsewhere. These rolling dropout dates made it nearly impossible to log meaningful results.

• 44 babies (13%) dropped out of the trial, creating a serious gap in the efficacy evidence.

• The efficacy window was so short (7 days after the 2^nd dose to 1 month after delivery) the study couldn’t answer the critical question, “will the vaccines prevent infections, illness, hospitalization, or death?”

• The original protocol had to be amended mid-stream when the authors acknowledged the efficacy measurement was collapsing.

After months of study, the authors still weren’t able to tell if the vaccine helps more than harms pregnant women. Pfizer wasn’t deterred.

Pfizer’s Conclusion

The Pfizer pregnancy study was a statistical mess that proved nothing. That didn’t stop the company from concluding:

“Overall, the data from this study support a favorable benefit risk profile in pregnant women and their infants.”

Alternatives were ignored

There were safe, accurate studies Pfizer could have conducted, but did not. Among them:

• Follow large cohorts of vaccinate versus unvaccinated women.

• Compare the vaccination status of pregnant women who got severe COVID against those who didn’t.

• Link to other nation’s health registries

Pfizer ignored all of these, instead opting for the faster, cheaper, inconclusive antibody testing.

FDA’s Unforgiveable Conceit

Pregnant women, especially vulnerable during “one of the worst pandemics in American history”, looked to the FDA and CDC for guidance. These were the trusted institutions they relied on.

We know with certainty the FDA knew before they issued the liability-deleting EUA that the vaccines might not be safe or effective for pregnant women.

On December 11, 2020, in the same document that authorized the vaccine’s use, the FDA ordered Pfizer to study pregnant women after authorization—because the data didn’t exist at authorization.

The EUA letter states in the conditions of authorization, the FDA required Pfizer to:

“conduct post-authorization observational studies... The study population should include... pregnant women, immunocompromised individuals...”

The FDA simultaneously authorized use in a vulnerable population and admitted it had no safety data on that population. Instead they kicked the can to post-market observational studies that would take years. In the end, regardless of claims, they didn’t prove if it was safe or effective.

The unforgiveable conceit was the FDA’s arrogance in thinking they could lie to the public, place millions of women and their babies at risk, document the lies in legal papers, and be confident the public would never be the wiser.

That’s the ultimate corruption and it didn’t take the Fauci diaries to uncover it.

2025 Study Shows Good Reason for Concern

A June 2025 Israeli study reveals the COVID ‘vaccines’ are not safe for pregnant mothers. Among mothers who received the jabs during weeks 8-13, an additional 4 babies died out of every 100 pregnancies compared to those who did not receive the COVID vaccines.

This preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. However, it is unique.

The study uses a observed-to-expected approach which follows the baseline fetal-loss rates from the same population over six years (2016–2022), across 226,395 single pregnancies for both the COVID and flu vaccines.

Why This Study Matters

Instead of comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated women, it compares vaccinated women’s fetal losses to the expected loss rate for their exact gestational week eliminating the healthy vaccinee bias inherent in many studies.

• Women receiving dose 1 during their weeks 8–13: There were ~13 observed deaths vs ~9 expected per 100 exposed pregnancies

  • That’s 3.9 additional fetal losses per 100 (95% CI 2.55–5.14)

• Those who received dose 3 during weeks 8–13: also saw increased losses. There were ~1.9 additional losses per 100 (95% CI 0.39–3.42)

• Most excess losses occurred after week 20, nearly half after week 25 — meaning these are late losses/stillbirths, not early miscarriages. This is the opposite of what you’d expect if vaccination merely caused a clustering of early losses.

• COVID or flu vaccination before pregnancy showed expected or lower-than-expected losses.

The same analytical method, applied to the same population, finds no excess deaths for flu vaccine, or for pre-pregnancy COVID vaccination. But there is a clear, dose-related increase in babies’ deaths for COVID vaccination dosed during the 8–13 week window.

This drug should never have been approved for pregnant mothers.

Conclusion

This all begins with dishonest politicians who approve dishonest agency chiefs who in turn engage in dishonest practices.

The question is no longer if many government experts lie, but when are they not.

Only the people can stop this by demanding transparency and removing those who undermine it. Listen carefully to what politicians say, and watch what they do even more carefully.

Protect your families. Trust nothing coming from government without verifying the information through original sources. Little of what the ‘experts’ told us during COVID made sense. Don’t fall for their routine again, because it will repeat.